Every week, inventors spend thousands of dollars filing patents for ideas that already exist.
Not “sort of” exist. Not “vaguely similar.” Already patented — sometimes word for word, mechanism for mechanism. And they don’t find out until a patent examiner rejects their application 18 months later, after they’ve already paid $8,000-15,000 in attorney fees.
This is entirely preventable. It starts with a prior art search.
What Is Prior Art?
Prior art is anything that was publicly known or available before your patent filing date. This includes:
- Existing patents (active or expired) — US and international
- Published patent applications — even ones that were never granted
- Academic papers and journals
- Products already on the market
- Public demonstrations, trade shows, or published descriptions
- Your own public disclosures (yes, showing your invention at a trade show without a provisional on file can count as prior art against you)
If someone can point to prior art that describes your invention before your filing date, your patent claims can be invalidated — even after the patent has been granted.
What a Prior Art Search Actually Looks Like
A proper prior art search isn’t Googling your idea and checking the first page of results. It’s a systematic investigation across multiple patent databases:
Databases Searched
- USPTO (United States Patent and Trademark Office) — US patents and published applications
- WIPO (World Intellectual Property Organization) — international PCT applications
- EPO (European Patent Office) — European patents
- Google Patents — aggregates patents from dozens of countries
- Espacenet — European patent database with worldwide coverage
What We’re Looking For
- Identical inventions — Has someone already patented exactly what you’re describing?
- Similar inventions — Are there patents that cover the same problem with a similar mechanism?
- Component overlap — Does an existing patent claim a key element of your design, even if the overall device is different?
- Expired patents — These are actually good news. Expired patents are public domain — anyone can use them. And they often reveal the boundaries of what’s been tried before.
- White space — Where does your invention sit that nobody else has claimed?
The Deliverable
You get a written report that includes:
- Summary of relevant patents found (typically 10-30 patents reviewed in detail)
- Claim-by-claim analysis of the closest matches
- Assessment of novelty — what’s new about your invention
- Assessment of risk — where potential conflicts exist
- Recommendations — file, modify, or pivot
Why Most Inventors Skip This Step
Three reasons:
1. They think they already checked.
“I Googled it and didn’t find anything.” Google web search is not a patent search. Most patents don’t show up in regular Google results. The inventions that matter — the ones that could block your patent — are buried in patent databases with technical language that doesn’t match the words you’d naturally search for.
2. They’re excited and want to move fast.
Totally understandable. You’ve been thinking about this invention for months. You want to file, get your “Patent Pending” status, and start building. But filing without searching is like building a house without checking if someone else owns the land.
3. They think it’s too expensive.
Patent attorneys charge $1,000-2,500 for a prior art search. That feels like a lot when you haven’t even filed yet. But compare it to the alternative: $8,000-15,000 for a patent application that gets rejected because of prior art you could have found for $500.
What a Prior Art Search Saves You
Scenario A: You Skip the Search
- File a provisional patent: $3,000-5,000 (attorney fees + filing)
- Develop a prototype: $2,000-10,000
- File a non-provisional patent: $8,000-15,000
- 18 months later: patent examiner cites prior art you never saw
- Respond to office action: $2,000-5,000
- Final rejection: your claims are narrowed to uselessness, or the patent is denied entirely
- Total lost: $15,000-35,000 and 2+ years
Scenario B: You Do the Search First
- Prior art search: $500
- Discover a 2014 patent that covers your exact mechanism
- Modify your design to work around the prior art
- File a provisional with a stronger, differentiated invention
- Total saved: potentially $15,000+ and years of frustration
Or:
- Prior art search: $500
- Discover there’s almost nothing in your space
- File with confidence, knowing your invention has genuine novelty
- Patent examiner finds the same clear landscape you already mapped
- Smooth prosecution, stronger patent, less money spent on office actions
When to Do a Prior Art Search
Before you file anything. Ideally before you spend significant money on prototyping.
The best sequence:
- Sketch your concept
- Prior art search — understand the landscape
- Refine your design based on what you learn
- Provisional patent — lock in your priority date
- Prototype and develop
- Non-provisional patent — formal claims, attorney involvement
How PartSnap Does It Differently
Most prior art searches come from patent attorneys who charge $300-600/hour. They’re thorough, but they’re expensive — and they deliver results in legal language that most inventors struggle to interpret.
We’re engineers. We deliver prior art search results in plain language with clear visual comparisons between your invention and existing patents. We tell you — directly — whether your idea has a clear path or significant obstacles. No hedging, no billable-hour padding.
Our prior art search is $500. It includes:
- Comprehensive search across USPTO, WIPO, EPO, and Google Patents
- Analysis of 10-30+ relevant patents
- Claim-by-claim comparison against your concept
- Written patentability assessment
- Clear recommendation: file, modify, or pivot
- Delivered in 5-7 business days
If you decide to move forward with a provisional patent filing, the $500 search fee is credited toward our $1,500 Search + Provisional package.
Ready to Find Out Where Your Invention Stands?
Call: (214) 449-1455
Email: info@partsnap.com
We’ll do a free 15-minute consultation to understand your invention and tell you whether a prior art search makes sense for your situation.
Or view our full Patent & IP Services page for pricing details.
PartSnap provides patent research and provisional patent preparation services. We are not a law firm and do not provide legal advice. For formal patent prosecution, we recommend consulting with a registered patent attorney.
